To say there have been many changes in the funding landscape over the last 18 months is hardly an overstatement. PIs have paid close attention to news of budgets, agencies, new priorities, the fates of individual programs, and staffing changes.

Especially following all of that, it is encouraging when new opportunities appear, and recently there have been many examples. The DOE’s Genesis Mission is one that attracted attention, especially because of its wide range of supported topics. NSF also has announced initiatives that may sound exciting and relevant to PIs.

These developments present a challenge: finding the balance between being informed and being distracted by every new opportunity that appears.

This is where a concept from the business world can be useful: shiny object syndrome. It refers to a tendency to be distracted by a new idea, opportunity or trend before you have given your current strategy enough time to actually deliver results.

One might begin with a reasonable plan and work toward it but then get discouraged if results fail to arrive as quickly as hoped. The original plan may have seemed exciting at an earlier point but after some of its shine has worn off something else shows up and looks more promising — simply because it is new.

In our world of research funding, this can appear in a number of guises. If a new funding opportunity appears, you might immediately start rewriting something you had already been working on for that new opportunity. If you hear of a new priority, you may start reshaping a research plan around it. If colleagues talk about a particular new opportunity, you may begin asking whether you should pursue it, too.

The problem is not the new opportunity itself but rather when it causes you to abandon a plan that is still sound.

The real risk of shiny object syndrome is that you keep moving from one thing to the next without giving any one path sufficient time to develop, to be tested, revised, submitted or otherwise shown to be viable. In the end, if you give up on the original plan too quickly, you may never know whether it would have worked.

Our message here is not that you should stop paying attention to how agencies are shifting priorities, or where funds may become available. Continue staying informed. Read agency newsletters. Follow communications from your research office. Pay attention to new opportunities, changing priorities, and the vocabularies agencies are using.

But as you consider those new opportunities, view them in the context of what you are already doing. Ask whether a new opportunity would build on something you are already well positioned to do. Ask if it fits the work you are already developing, or whether you are trying to force a connection to something that may pull you off track.

It is also useful to ask what would happen if you pursued the new opportunity but it did not work out. Would you be able to reuse the proposal content for another program? Could it be adapted to a different opportunity? Or might you have created something so specific to that one opportunity that it would be difficult to use it elsewhere?

Note there is always an opportunity cost. When you are working on something, that is time and effort you cannot put toward something else. One sign that you may be caught in shiny object syndrome is that you keep moving from one project to another, or from one plan to another without seeing any of them through far enough to learn from them.

Something like this appears with named early-career awards. As we have said, these awards can be great opportunities, and Wise Investigator has supported winners of them. However, when named awards receive so much attention, PIs may miss opportunities for equal amounts of support, or perhaps even more, from the same organizations through their core programs.

We will not know numbers from these new initiatives for a while, but it is reasonable to anticipate that some awards will have very low acceptance rates  — mostly because they have been attracting so much attention and therefore many submissions. This does not mean you should not apply — but It does mean that the excitement around a new opportunity should not be the only reason for pursuing it.

A good strategy is to be flexible but not constantly reactive. Adapt your framing, explore new programs, consider new applications of your work and pay attention to how agency priorities are evolving — but do all that without abandoning the larger research direction you have built.

The goal is to remain informed while keeping your opportunities in context. The question is not,  “Is this new?” It is instead:

“Is this a real fit for the work I am positioned to do?”

This video explains why new funding opportunities can be worth watching closely, but should not automatically pull you away from a sound research funding strategy. I discuss how to tell whether an opportunity is a real fit for the work you are positioned to do, or simply a shiny object that may distract from stronger paths.

Need to get your research funded, this year? Check out our 12-week program to get you there.

Check out our storefront where you can access our free Unlocking DOD Funding for University Researchers course and other resources, including for faculty applicants.

Ready to book a call to discuss how our program can support faculty at your institution? Let’s chat!